Guest Blog: Cynthia Reese
I hereby give the floor to Cynthia Reese, who is answering all the questions you asked on this post.
She will also be giving away a copy of her new release to one lucky commenter!
(blog) (web site) (Harlequin author page)
you sold?
The novel this started out as was my SECOND completed novel (first one's tucked safely under the bed), but I did have to do massive revisions on the book twice before it sold. So ... um, I don't know. Between the time I finished the first draft of THE BABY WAIT and the time it sold, I wrote three more novels and started on a fourth.
then look for a publisher?
I targeted Harlequin/Silhouette because I knew (a) they took unagented material and I'd read beaucoups of their books.
after you began writing the book that sold?
Actually, I started writing THE BABY WAIT as a Harlequin NEXT. It was only after a major revision and a decision from NEXT that it was good, but a Super instead of a NEXT that THE BABY WAIT ended up on the desk of my lovely and talented editor Laura Shin, who's the head honcho for Super.
Collages? Spreadsheets? A combo of some or all of the above?
You're going to die laughing, but I, um, start with a synopsis. I kid you not. I write what I call a "movie synopsis," and tell the story the same way you'd tell a friend about a movie. I usually start with a basic idea of the characters and their jobs and their lots in life - and their conflict, of course, and then I just ... make it all up as I go in the "movie synopsis." Once I get the broad strokes down on paper (and it's very broad and very rough, mind you), I go back and do a chapter-by-chapter outline, sort of a how-do-I-get-there-from-here list.
On the outline, I do a paragraph summary of each chapter. It may or may not stay that way through the course of my writing, but that's how I do it.
The good thing about writing the synopsis before you start writing is two-fold: (a) you don't know all the twists and turns and it's easier to lay out a clear character arc (which I think editors are really looking for) and write a short synopsis, and (b) plot holes SHINE big time - my CPs are great at showing me what plot holes I need to plug.
win, agent submission, etc.)
My foot in the door was two-pronged ... I was lucky enough to be able to pitch to the NEXT acquiring editor at my local RWA chapter, which is how I got a request for a partial. But I actually came to the attention of my current editor through Harlequin's EVERLASTING contest. I'd written a book that I THOUGHT was for EVERLASTING and was bummed when I didn't win, place or show.
But then I got the letter back from the editorial assistant who worked for both EVERLASTING and for Super, and she asked me to revise and resubmit the story to Super. I did, and Laura Shin regretfully had to pass on that story because of marketing reasons. But I was on her radar, and when THE BABY WAIT showed up on her desk, she knew my name. So I highly recommend both approaches!
affirm once again that it really can happen.
I'd started a jillion novels and callously abandoned them all at Chapter Three, but in Dec. 2004, I decided that my New Year's resolution for 2005 would be to finish the dang book. I finished that one, sent it to a CP who kindly told me that I had NO romance in it (a bit of a problem when you are targeting Harlequin, LOL), and I decided that I'd try my hand at women's fiction - Harlequin's NEXT line. I finished my second book (an earlier incarnation of THE BABY WAIT) and pitched it to NEXT's then editor Jen Green at my GRW meeting in May of 2005.
In July of 2005, she called me and told me she liked my voice and liked the premise, but "the conflict is too predictable." She offered to read the full if I would revise. I did - yanking out the last two-thirds of the book and rewriting. I sent it in the first of October 2005, and then a bit later found Jen Green had been transferred to Harlequin American.
At that point, I lost hope. But in December of 2005, Ann Leslie Tuttle e-mailed me that she was recommending the book as a buy to her boss. I was over the moon! I thought for sure I'd sold.
In March of 2006, though, my dreams came crashing down when her boss said, "You know, I think this is a Super." So Ann Leslie, lovely lady that she is, sent it to Laura Shin, who read it, liked it, but said, "Eh ... too women's fiction. Can you revise?"
Of course! So I did. I sent it in not long before Nationals at RWA. But a few days after Nationals, I was feeling blue and down - I was writing a tough book, and my characters weren't cooperating. I also thought that I'd made a mistake not to change the POV in THE BABY WAIT to third - I'd left it at first. It was like a big "please reject me" sign on the project.
But about a week after Nationals, I saw a strange number on my cell phone caller ID, and after business hours, realized it was Harlequin's number. I spent a sleepless night trying to prepare myself for more revisions ... screwed up my courage and called Laura the next morning, where she said in the calmest voice imaginable, "I'd like to buy your book."
I shrieked. That's it. I just shrieked. Then called everybody I knew and shrieked some more.
Hmmm ... least favorite part - the middle, like everybody else, although the first hundred pp are really tough for me - it just feels like I'm getting nowhere.
Start in the middle of the action - characters don't need to be sleeping, talking, driving, or thinking - they need to be doing - and doing something that's going to be the equivalent of a six-car-pileup on a major interstate - something that will make people (readers) rubberneck, slow down and not want to leave the scene.
does that mean?
I have no clue. I know what it used to mean to me - that a book uses the more traditional hooks and that (sometimes) the author doesn't take the chances on premise or characters. But I think that's unfair in a sense - because I've read so many really great category novels that felt big and deep and complex - better than some STs I've read. I think that category writers have to fit a more compact story arc in a shorter number of words, so naturally the premises and conflict might not be as complex as a ST. I guess it would be like saying sit-com versus drama - but who could say that FRIENDS was inferior to ER just because ER was an hour long and FRIENDS was thirty minutes? They were different animals, right? Apples and oranges, and all that.
Are they your first? Were you given any advice (or do you have any advice)
on how to make the most of book signings?
First, DON'T do it like I did, newbie that I am. I sort of fell into these. I'd approached my area district manager of Wal-Mart to get permission to sign in-stock books, and he was so excited that he asked if I'd be willing to do in-store signings. So then he put me in touch with Anderson's - Wal-Mart's book supplier, who very gently told me I should have contacted Harlequin first. Who knew? So I would suggest asking your publisher first, then setting it up through the book supplier who actually provides the books for your store. And I highly encourage talking to bookstore managers directly - they're usually thrilled to have an author come in. I know I've had to turn down offers to sign because I couldn't balance it with my very busy day-job.
I can't sum it up any better than the blurb on the back of my novel:
Sara Tennyson has it all planned. In two months she'll travel to China to adopt the baby girl she's always wanted. Even after a mountain of setbacks, she has the faith that one day she'll hold her daughter. But that's before the man she loves begins to doubt.
Joe is Mr. Fixit. The only thing he can't do is get Sara her baby. Now, after all the disappointment they've faced, he's beginning to wonder if their little family was really meant to be.
Sara can't give up her dream, but what if waiting for her baby wait means losing Joe?
The only other thing that I might add is that a portion of the royalties of this book will go toward two different charities benefiting Chinese orphans. One is Love Without Boundaries and the other is Our Chinese Daughters Foundation.
out?
My next Super, WHERE LOVE GROWS, will come out in October of this year. I'm working on proposals for more Supers, and I'm revising a ST women's fiction project.
Be open to revisions! I truly believe my willingness to revise multiple times helped me in my pursuit of publication. And persist in writing and submitting, even in the face of rejections -- after all, as Charles Spurgeon said, "Perseverance is what got the snail to the ark!"
Thanks, Cynthia!
Your turn: Are you targeting (or if you're published, did you target) a particular publisher or line? What are your thoughts on Cynthia's many-revisions road to publication? Do you attack rewriting with vigor or do you prefer to move on to the next story? What about her method of starting with the synopsis--Do you make yours before or after? Are they easy or hard for you? Leave your comments below and you'll be entered to win the free book drawing, results to be posted on Monday!

Let's be friends!
19 comments--Add your own!!:
Thanks, Erica, for letting me have the floor -- I noticed my fingers got happy and I had a few typos in there, so I do apologize!
And I'm interested in hearing other people's answers to the questions you posed!
Hi Cynthia! Thanks for being so wonderful about answering all the questions. You do a great interview! =)
I have no problem with revisions. I've done multiple revisions on my current YA MSS and have no issues with revising. I'd rather the manuscript be as nearly perfect as possible before an editor sees it. I'm all about a good first impression! :)
What a great interview. Thanks Erica and Cynthia! I'm not targeting a specific line or publisher with my ST. I just wrote what felt right for the story and hope that someone picks it up. If someone asked for revisions, I'd do them in the hopes of getting published, but would keep the original story just in case I didn't sell to that publisher.
Hope you're feeling better Erica!
Great! I loved all of it. Cynthia do you attend the GRW meetings because I'm a member? I'm targeting Avon but would definitely open to all other publishing houses. I do a synopsis type outline before I even write Chapter One on the first page. I'm a plotter so I need to know exactly where the story is going. And hey, I would be totally up for revisions, especially if it brought be closer to publication. Although I would hate to lose the heart of my story in revisions.
Are you targeting (or if you're published, did you target) a particular publisher or line?
Right now I am. I'm writing a 5K short targeted for Harlequin Spice Briefs
Do you attack rewriting with vigor or do you prefer to move on to the next story?
When I got a revise and resubmit request from Cobblestone for Crystal Clear I was a bit stymied. Luckily the publisher had asked for a couple of specific things (longer and more h/h interaction). But I was on my own to interpret that, which was tough. I had to rethink the entire book. BUT, it turned out better than the first!
What about her method of starting with the synopsis--
I use Randy Ingermanson's snowflake method to plot my books (start with a hook and work from there). So, I have a set of scenes to write to as I go. Of course, lots of times they change, but I go back and change the scene descriptions. Then, by the time I'm done, I can just flesh out the skeleton of the synopsis if necessary.
I write my true synopsis after the book. and even with the skeleton, they are hard! It's just not easy being entertaining in the synopsis (by page 2, I'm yawning at mine)
Beverly, I DO attend GRW meetings -- but I live three-plus hours away, and I have to work loads of Saturdays, so I get there when I can. I was at last month's meetings, and in May, I'll be at GRW and signing THE BABY WAIT.
Oops, just realized I mis-spelled Beverley's name! Sorry!
One more thing on revisions, ladies ... the thing I've found is I like my story a whole heap better AFTER a massive revision. But they are hard, because, while the editor gave me good big picture advice, I was on my own as to how to implement it.
Erika, hats off to ANYBODY who uses the Snowflake method -- it would drive me crazy. But that's the important thing: do what works for you. Writing the synopsis FIRST works for me because I hate the chore of trying to decide what goes in and what stays out after I've written a very complex story.
Plus, you've got to learn how to do that anyway when you start selling on proposal -- I'm glad I had pubbed writers who showed me how to do a synopsis!
Cynthia -- Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us! I've used the snowflake method successfully (*ducking* ;?)), but have also tried writing the synopsis first. Sometimes, I think it depends, book by book, like anything else.
On revisions -- I think that would be tough, but if it was an editor I trusted, I would feel safe doing it.
Great interview, thanks.
I use the snowflake method too. Actually, now it's more a partial snowflake. I do all the steps for the plot side of things and finish with a scene spreadsheet, which usually gets changed slightly as I'm writing.
Great questions for us, Cynthia.
Are you targeting (or if you're published, did you target) a particular publisher or line?
Not really. I kind of just write what I feel like writing.
What are your thoughts on Cynthia's many-revisions road to publication?
Lots of revisions are necessary. Absolutely.
Do you attack rewriting with vigor or do you prefer to move on to the next story?
Yes. ;)
What about her method of starting with the synopsis--Do you make yours before or after?
About 3/4 of the way through.
Are they easy or hard for you?
Once I've figured out that my original idea was crap, and figured out what my book is actually about, the synopsis isn't that hard. It's the writing the book first that's more difficult.
Cynthia, your blog rocks! I loved reading every word. Thanks for sharing your advice. :) Again congrats on your success.
Are you targeting (or if you're published, did you target) a particular publisher or line?
Yes and no. I'm keeping Avon, Berkley and HQN in mind though. :)
What are your thoughts on Cynthia's many-revisions road to publication?
I think this was one of the best pieces of advice. It's important to be willing to work with an editor/agent even if you haven't sold to them just yet. It shows your potential and your willingness to work and flexibility as well.
Do you attack rewriting with vigor or do you prefer to move on to the next story?
Haven't reached this point in my writing yet. I'd say that I would set aside that MSS for a few weeks before I do revisions.
What about her method of starting with the synopsis--Do you make yours before or after? Are they easy or hard for you?
Call it serendipidity, but I'm actually writing a synopsis before I start my book. After so many crash and burn attempts at writing my MSS, I'm doing the synopsis first this time around. And so far writing the synopsis has been challenging, I'm about to strangle my inner editor...lol
Thanks, Cynthia and Erica. This was pretty cool!
Best,
Isabel
Hi Cynthia,
Thanks so much for your wonderful and inspiring answers. I cut and pasted your comment about opening pages into my current WIP--I definitely need to work on creating that six-car-pileup.
THE BABY WAIT sounds great! I'm living in China right now and volunteering at an orphanage. Believe me, it is enough to tear your heart out. What an amazing way to give something back by donating proceeds to those charities. I know someone here who is trying to adopt one of the orphans and is having a terrible, frustrating time. It's so sad.
Thanks, Erica, for inviting Cynthia!
Hey, guys, thanks for the great response -- and I think it's great that writers can use different methods for plotting -- heck, I'm impressed with people who can pantser!
Isabel, you fire that internal editor -- or at least send him/her on a six-weeks vacation! And good luck!
And Lenora, I'm jealous! I so want to go back to China! I hope the family who is attempting to adopt the orphan has all the luck in the world -- may their own "Baby Wait" have a HEA!!
Hey, guys, thanks for the great response -- and I think it's great that writers can use different methods for plotting -- heck, I'm impressed with people who can pantser!
Isabel, you fire that internal editor -- or at least send him/her on a six-weeks vacation! And good luck!
And Lenora, I'm jealous! I so want to go back to China! I hope the family who is attempting to adopt the orphan has all the luck in the world -- may their own "Baby Wait" have a HEA!!
Great post! I enjoyed reading all your responses. And I like to start writing for a synopsis, too. Guess we're both just weird like that :-)
Fantastic questions and answers here! It's nice to hear Cynthia's trials and successes! Imagine all that time of writing and writing some more. We've all been there. It's really nice to hear these positive stories of success.
Thanks Erica for sharing this with us all!
Great post! And just what I needed to keep moving forward with revisions. Thanks Cynthia and Erica.
I can honestly say when I entered romance it was upon request from a few publishers who were looking for cross-genre. One of them was Harlequin for Nocturne. In the case of that Line, my word count became too much of an issue.
I follow a process my sisters and I devised which is a mix of the snow-flake and tapestry. Since we are stronger in short format, we often go back and layer in setting, and characterization after the backbone of the story is planted. We also look for aspects of dropped plots and subplots. We might also streamline the story at the point of revision.
Considering I start with the blurb, then grow my story, synopsises are never very hard for me. I also title every chapter, and know exactly where my crisis points are so I never have to worry about turn-points in a synop.
Great interview, Cynthia. Good luck and much success.
Post a Comment